Skip to main content

Review of The Woman Who Cooked Her Husband at The Playhouse Theatre, Northampton

During the interval of The Woman Who Cooked Her Husband, last weeks production at The Playhouse Theatre Northampton, I got involved in a conversation between a couple sitting next to me. The lady was very much of the opinion that the play was a comedy, while the gentleman, had formed one that it was a tragedy. They were joking of course in the conversation, but it did highlight the differences that Debbie Isitt's dark comedy might have between the sexes. And also now perhaps the passing of time. When this was written in the nineties, Isitt's play was a forthright feminist play, heralding the championing over of the ladies over the man. One the ex-wife plotting to cook him, the other, the new lover, potentially already very tired of him after just three years.

The husband, Kenneth (Jem Clack) elopes initially in pursuit of sex with Laura (Diane Wyman), after his nineteen years of marriage with Hilary (Corinna Leeder) has become tired and passionless. Then later, he elopes secretly back towards his former wife in pursuit of better things for his stomach, as his new wife doesn't possess the culinary skills of Hilary.

"Of course you can cook, you're a bloody woman, aren't you?" is his comment to his new wife at the suggestion she can't, and it was one of a few lines, both brilliant and more than a little controversial that got the audience rightfully laughing away to this clever comedy.

However, what of the feminist angle? Perhaps that has dated via the further empowerment of women, but it lives on as a curious piece of social history, as to how 25 years ago, women, via this play, attempted to gain power in the male-dominated world. Isitt's play often makes the women look weak though in it's attempt to empower them. They have a need for this guy, who simply put, is a bit of a slob and not really worth catching really, but in this play they want someone like him to cook for and provide for them. However, it doesn't make it wrong, even now, to see how a playwright back then saw fit to try to gain a rightful foothold in society in the early nineties, and that is much of the joy of seeing this play in a modern context. We are beyond this now (but still not at the equal point), but look folks, this is the sort of stuff that perhaps helped start the charge.

There are three wonderful performances from Clack, Leeder and Wyman in this, all confident and assured in their forming of the characters. In the greatest respect to Mr Clack, he makes a perfect flesh crawling slob of a character, and it sure helped perhaps that the weather caused him to become ever more characterful with sweat pouring from him, although it must have been taxing for all the performers. Wyman is great as Laura, happy to fulfil Kenneth's needs but also gloriously bitchy enough in her replies to give him short shrift when he demands his food, with a curt "make a sandwich". Corinna meanwhile is superb as Hilary, quietly plotting revenge, and she creates a character oozing with interest for the audience, and for me, easily the best performance I have seen from her in my five years of attending The Playhouse.

Staging is simple, really simple (I remain unsure of the hula hoops which occupied left and right walls), but perhaps extremely useful for this piece which is character led that any need for clutter, especially freeing up plenty of space for the meaty monologues that form much of the play. Props are stripped back to such an extent that they don't really exist, with Hilary kitchen knife the sole item beyond the furniture. It's disconcerting at times to see miming of all things, including the simplicity of drinks and would not suit all. However, later, when Kenneth is devouring his feast, it looks sublime in the simple task of imaging his chop dribbling with drool and grease from the food.

It wasn't perfect, there were more than a few volume issues, and not all because of the fans required to keep the theatre cool on the evening. Volumes, as the actors drifted away from the audience, were often not raised enough to carry to the back of the audience.

One of my favourite scenes in the play, was the silent piece performed with strobe lighting as Kenneth went about his day of maintaining his two relationships. The lighting was intense with that in such a small space, but the visual impact that it had on the scene was simply superb, and brilliantly performed by Clack in the languid style.

The Woman Who Cooked Her Husband is very much a product of its time, and it is easy to say that it is dated as a result. However, it stands up extremely well as both a very funny and biting comedy, and as a sort of curious commentary on the recent social history of where we were, where we are, and where we still need to travel. Extremely good fun.

Performance reviewed: Saturday 14 July 2018 at the Playhouse Theatre, Northampton.

The Woman Who Cooked Her Husband ran at the Playhouse Theatre, Northampton between Tuesday 10 and Saturday 14 2018.

For full details of the Playhouse Theatre visit their website at https://www.playhousenorthampton.com/
and can be found on Twitter @PlayhouseNTH or on Facebook at 
https://www.facebook.com/groups/1104164619627708/

Photo: Vicki Holland

Popular posts from this blog

Review of Blood Brothers at Milton Keynes Theatre

Willy Russell's Blood Brothers is a remarkable show that, to any respectable theatre-goer, needs little introduction; however, a little introduction is still in order. First produced in 1983 in Liverpool, Russell had adapted the musical from a high school play he had written, introducing his own music and lyrics into the tale of the twins Mickey and Eddie, and their mother, Mrs Johnstone. From its very first run on stage at the Liverpool Playhouse, the sign was there that Blood Brothers was a very special show, and as a result, it now tours almost constantly in the UK, packing audiences wherever it goes. So, what can be said now that hasn't already been said? Very little, really; however, I must try. This latest production, opening a new tour at Milton Keynes Theatre, continues the format of old and brings the story still vibrantly to life. Also, this new tour still includes someone who is now as much a part of the show as Russell himself. Sean Jones has now played Mickey, th...

Camden Fringe Review: FEET by Emma And Lawrence Wrote A Play at Etcetera Theatre, London

While some issue plays tend to miss the point of providing fun and entertainment as well as making their point on a relevant issue, FEET is certainly not one of them. Written, produced, directed and performed by the two-person team of Emma And Lawrence Wrote A Play, this is clearly a labour of love of the two, full names Emma Brown and Lawrence Smith, it is fun and engaging throughout. It's "issue" is loosely about selling your body for money or art and how far you might be willing to push it. Lucy Winwood (Emma Brown) is your typical young actress, struggling hard to get those money making roles, or roles in general, and in need of money she stumbles upon the world of feet fetishism (as you, of course, would) and slowly from just images of her feet sold online, it becomes feet in jelly and then finally personal meetings with clients for full on feet interaction. The path that FEET takes is that is this denigration of your body in selling your feet actually worse than...

Review of Rambert Dance in Peaky Blinders - The Redemption of Thomas Shelby at Royal & Derngate (Derngate), Northampton

The Rambert Dance Company is the oldest such company in Britain having first performed in 1926. However, despite this, this was my first encounter with the group in my ten years of theatre-going. Coupled with this, it was also my first encounter with Peaky Blinders , having never seen the show, and only knowing a few vague things about it. My companion for the evening however was very familiar with the show, allowing some background behind the show. It turns out though,  Rambert Dance in Peaky Blinders - The Redemption of Thomas Shelby needs a little more than a good bit of knowledge of the show, as despite this production having incredible style, there struggles to be a cohesive structure to the show and the storytelling. Much more than other dance shows as well. The first act does a whistle-stop tour of the first five seasons and while it is a feast on the eye, and on the ear, it gets extremely confusing at times. The second act is freestyle and drifts away from the stories tol...